x86/CPU/AMD: Bring back Compute Unit ID
authorBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Sun, 5 Feb 2017 10:50:21 +0000 (11:50 +0100)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:25:41 +0000 (15:25 -0800)
commit 79a8b9aa388b0620cc1d525d7c0f0d9a8a85e08e upstream.

Commit:

  a33d331761bc ("x86/CPU/AMD: Fix Bulldozer topology")

restored the initial approach we had with the Fam15h topology of
enumerating CU (Compute Unit) threads as cores. And this is still
correct - they're beefier than HT threads but still have some
shared functionality.

Our current approach has a problem with the Mad Max Steam game, for
example. Yves Dionne reported a certain "choppiness" while playing on
v4.9.5.

That problem stems most likely from the fact that the CU threads share
resources within one CU and when we schedule to a thread of a different
compute unit, this incurs latency due to migrating the working set to a
different CU through the caches.

When the thread siblings mask mirrors that aspect of the CUs and
threads, the scheduler pays attention to it and tries to schedule within
one CU first. Which takes care of the latency, of course.

Reported-by: Yves Dionne <yves.dionne@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170205105022.8705-1-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c

index 984a7bf..83db0ea 100644 (file)
@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ struct cpuinfo_x86 {
        __u8                    x86_phys_bits;
        /* CPUID returned core id bits: */
        __u8                    x86_coreid_bits;
+       __u8                    cu_id;
        /* Max extended CPUID function supported: */
        __u32                   extended_cpuid_level;
        /* Maximum supported CPUID level, -1=no CPUID: */
index 1d31672..20dc44d 100644 (file)
@@ -309,8 +309,15 @@ static void amd_get_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 
        /* get information required for multi-node processors */
        if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)) {
+               u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
 
-               node_id = cpuid_ecx(0x8000001e) & 7;
+               cpuid(0x8000001e, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+
+               node_id  = ecx & 0xff;
+               smp_num_siblings = ((ebx >> 8) & 0xff) + 1;
+
+               if (c->x86 == 0x15)
+                       c->cu_id = ebx & 0xff;
 
                /*
                 * We may have multiple LLCs if L3 caches exist, so check if we
index 023c7bf..4eece91 100644 (file)
@@ -1015,6 +1015,7 @@ static void identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
        c->x86_model_id[0] = '\0';  /* Unset */
        c->x86_max_cores = 1;
        c->x86_coreid_bits = 0;
+       c->cu_id = 0xff;
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
        c->x86_clflush_size = 64;
        c->x86_phys_bits = 36;
index e9bbe02..36171bc 100644 (file)
@@ -423,9 +423,15 @@ static bool match_smt(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
                int cpu1 = c->cpu_index, cpu2 = o->cpu_index;
 
                if (c->phys_proc_id == o->phys_proc_id &&
-                   per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu1) == per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu2) &&
-                   c->cpu_core_id == o->cpu_core_id)
-                       return topology_sane(c, o, "smt");
+                   per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu1) == per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu2)) {
+                       if (c->cpu_core_id == o->cpu_core_id)
+                               return topology_sane(c, o, "smt");
+
+                       if ((c->cu_id != 0xff) &&
+                           (o->cu_id != 0xff) &&
+                           (c->cu_id == o->cu_id))
+                               return topology_sane(c, o, "smt");
+               }
 
        } else if (c->phys_proc_id == o->phys_proc_id &&
                   c->cpu_core_id == o->cpu_core_id) {