palmas_dev and palmas_power_off are always assigned together.
So the check for palmas_dev inside palmas_power_off function
is redundant. Removing the same.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
unsigned int addr;
int ret, slave;
- if (!palmas_dev)
- return;
-
slave = PALMAS_BASE_TO_SLAVE(PALMAS_PMU_CONTROL_BASE);
addr = PALMAS_BASE_TO_REG(PALMAS_PMU_CONTROL_BASE, PALMAS_DEV_CTRL);