xfs: allow multiple reclaimers per AG
authorDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:49:16 +0000 (14:49 -0700)
committerDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Tue, 7 Jul 2020 14:15:07 +0000 (07:15 -0700)
Inode reclaim will still throttle direct reclaim on the per-ag
reclaim locks. This is no longer necessary as reclaim can run
non-blocking now. Hence we can remove these locks so that we don't
arbitrarily block reclaimers just because there are more direct
reclaimers than there are AGs.

This can result in multiple reclaimers working on the same range of
an AG, but this doesn't cause any apparent issues. Optimising the
spread of concurrent reclaimers for best efficiency can be done in a
future patchset.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h

index fa4df9b..592eab2 100644 (file)
@@ -1211,12 +1211,9 @@ xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(
        int                     *nr_to_scan)
 {
        struct xfs_perag        *pag;
-       xfs_agnumber_t          ag;
-       int                     trylock = flags & SYNC_TRYLOCK;
-       int                     skipped;
+       xfs_agnumber_t          ag = 0;
+       int                     skipped = 0;
 
-       ag = 0;
-       skipped = 0;
        while ((pag = xfs_perag_get_tag(mp, ag, XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG))) {
                unsigned long   first_index = 0;
                int             done = 0;
@@ -1224,15 +1221,13 @@ xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(
 
                ag = pag->pag_agno + 1;
 
-               if (trylock) {
-                       if (!mutex_trylock(&pag->pag_ici_reclaim_lock)) {
-                               skipped++;
-                               xfs_perag_put(pag);
-                               continue;
-                       }
-                       first_index = pag->pag_ici_reclaim_cursor;
-               } else
-                       mutex_lock(&pag->pag_ici_reclaim_lock);
+               /*
+                * If the cursor is not zero, we haven't scanned the whole AG
+                * so we might have skipped inodes here.
+                */
+               first_index = READ_ONCE(pag->pag_ici_reclaim_cursor);
+               if (first_index)
+                       skipped++;
 
                do {
                        struct xfs_inode *batch[XFS_LOOKUP_BATCH];
@@ -1298,11 +1293,9 @@ xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(
 
                } while (nr_found && !done && *nr_to_scan > 0);
 
-               if (trylock && !done)
-                       pag->pag_ici_reclaim_cursor = first_index;
-               else
-                       pag->pag_ici_reclaim_cursor = 0;
-               mutex_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_reclaim_lock);
+               if (done)
+                       first_index = 0;
+               WRITE_ONCE(pag->pag_ici_reclaim_cursor, first_index);
                xfs_perag_put(pag);
        }
        return skipped;
index d5dcf98..03158b4 100644 (file)
@@ -148,7 +148,6 @@ xfs_free_perag(
                ASSERT(atomic_read(&pag->pag_ref) == 0);
                xfs_iunlink_destroy(pag);
                xfs_buf_hash_destroy(pag);
-               mutex_destroy(&pag->pag_ici_reclaim_lock);
                call_rcu(&pag->rcu_head, __xfs_free_perag);
        }
 }
@@ -200,7 +199,6 @@ xfs_initialize_perag(
                pag->pag_agno = index;
                pag->pag_mount = mp;
                spin_lock_init(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
-               mutex_init(&pag->pag_ici_reclaim_lock);
                INIT_RADIX_TREE(&pag->pag_ici_root, GFP_ATOMIC);
                if (xfs_buf_hash_init(pag))
                        goto out_free_pag;
@@ -242,7 +240,6 @@ xfs_initialize_perag(
 out_hash_destroy:
        xfs_buf_hash_destroy(pag);
 out_free_pag:
-       mutex_destroy(&pag->pag_ici_reclaim_lock);
        kmem_free(pag);
 out_unwind_new_pags:
        /* unwind any prior newly initialized pags */
@@ -252,7 +249,6 @@ out_unwind_new_pags:
                        break;
                xfs_buf_hash_destroy(pag);
                xfs_iunlink_destroy(pag);
-               mutex_destroy(&pag->pag_ici_reclaim_lock);
                kmem_free(pag);
        }
        return error;
index 3725d25..a72cfca 100644 (file)
@@ -354,7 +354,6 @@ typedef struct xfs_perag {
        spinlock_t      pag_ici_lock;   /* incore inode cache lock */
        struct radix_tree_root pag_ici_root;    /* incore inode cache root */
        int             pag_ici_reclaimable;    /* reclaimable inodes */
-       struct mutex    pag_ici_reclaim_lock;   /* serialisation point */
        unsigned long   pag_ici_reclaim_cursor; /* reclaim restart point */
 
        /* buffer cache index */